Hardware: Mathews No Cam HTR

by
posted on June 1, 2015
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
mathews_no_cam_htr_f.jpg

Mathews Archery proprietor Matt McPhearson has never stood idly on past merits. He’s a natural innovator, as seen in his once-revolutionary Solo Cam bows that dominated the hunting market for nearly two decades. His company’s new bow, the No Cam, aims to correct perhaps the Solo Cam’s only flaw—notably a relatively new term created by Mathews competitors called nock travel. For hunters it may not be important, but for the evolution of the archery industry—and for NRA members who are contemplating a new bow purchase—here’s the scoop.

Nock travel is the vertical and side-to-side movement of the nock when the bowstring is released. If the nock doesn’t move straight forward, the arrow can fishtail horizontally and porpoise vertically. While arrow fletching works to correct these shortcomings in flight, a bow’s accuracy potential is higher if the arrow flies perfectly from the start.

On single-cam bows, the cam’s rotational axis is different from that of the idler wheel and vertical nock travel occurs. On dual-cam bows, if cam timing isn’t exact the string is pulled up or down during the powerstroke, resulting in vertical nock travel. And if the force placed on the cams or wheels during the draw makes them lean even a millimeter to either side, horizontal nock travel occurs.

As daunting as all this sounds, however, the issue is more of a quest for engineers and a selling point for marketers—not a big deal for bowhunters. At bowhunting distances, a millimeter of nock travel is negligible, especially if it’s consistent. But for the advancement of bowhunting as a whole, don’t we want bows that are as accurate as they can possibly be? That’s why McPherson invented the No Cam.

Befitting its name, the No Cam utilizes two large wheels 4.28 inches in diameter to deliver the powerstroke. Because both are perfectly round and rotate on axles in their exact centers, they exhibit three traits. First, their rotation is concentric. Second, their rotation is always synchronized. Finally, the string remains at the same radius from the center of the wheels’ rotation during the entire stroke. These things mitigate timing issues and therefore vertical nock travel. Because the string remains in one channel, or track, cam lean is also minimized. Simple, right? Wrong.

If the bow used only these two round, concentrically mounted wheels, it wouldn’t afford the mechanical advantage necessary to flex and load the limbs—resulting in power—or to achieve let-off. The No Cam’s secret is its two smaller AVS (Advanced Vectoring System) wheels that are pinned alongside the large main wheels but in a non-concentric manner. They provide camming action to power the bow and are responsible for the draw-force curve the shooter feels. These wheels are slaved to a let-off module that also rotates, rather than to the limbs, so they stay synchronized. The shooter can choose 65, 75 or 85 percent let-off “RockMods.” Just know that the higher the let-off, the slower the speed. My test unit came with 85 percent let-off and a brace height of 65/8 inches.

The HTR features a slew of typical Mathews technology that enhances the bow’s effectiveness, such as a Geo Grid machined aluminum riser, two Harmonic Stabilizer riser inserts, Roller Guard, string stop, Monkey Tails to damper the string and cable, finish options and other whistles. The story here, though, is the innovative new eccentrics system.

I’ve read multiple reports that say the No Cam is Mathews’ smoothest bow ever. While it is silky smooth in terms of lack of friction, its draw stroke isn’t Mathews’ smoothest. Rather, it’s fairly aggressive and has notable “snap-over” just before entering a short valley. The No Cam is amazingly quiet, though, and inherently accurate.

I was initially skeptical of Mathews’ claims of nock travel elimination, but this is very tough to test scientifically and bow companies don’t reveal proprietary data. So I called Joe Marzullo. Joe is retired from manufacturing and engineering and is named on 37 U.S. patents. His passion is archery and, specifically, pushing the industry by developing his own testing devices. He’s often critical of manufacturers’ claims. “To date,” he said, “the No Cam is the best bow for lateral bow torque and nock travel that I have tested.”

The No Cam is not a speedster. My 60.2-pound, 26.5-inch test bow shot a 376-grain arrow 244.1 fps. (For comparison, last year’s Creed XS from Mathews shot 257.) But I’m a hunter and I’ll take the quietest bow over the speediest any day. I commend Mathews for trying to build the perfect hunting bow as most others push for speed.

I shot 2.1-inch groups at 30 yards with my No Cam—very good for me. The bow was as quiet as bows get. There was little vibration, and it was fun to shoot, especially as I stacked arrows in the bullseye. I love the simple Focus grip and the very firm back wall of the draw. All told, it’s a wonderful hunting and target bow, as it should be for $1,100.

Will other companies follow suit, or at least push the archery envelope to keep pace with Mathews? We’ll see. For now, the No Cam is convincing hunters because it’s quiet, easy to tune and, most importantly, supremely accurate. After all the hype, accuracy is what puts venison in the freezer and bucks on the wall.

Type: compound bow
Riser: machined aluminum Geo Grid
Limbs: parallel split
Let-Off: 65%, 75%, 85% (tested)
String and Cable: Zebra Trophy X
Grip: Focus Grip
Dimensions: axle-to-axle length 32"; weight 4.3 lbs. with two Harmonic Stabilizers
Brace Height: 6 5/8"
Draw Lengths: 24"-30" in .5" increments (26.5" tested)
Draw Weights: 50, 60 (tested), 70 lbs.
IBO Speed Rating: 330 fps (65% let-off)
Finish Options: Black Anthem, Tactical, Stone Tactical, Lost Camo, Lost Camo OT
MSRP: $1,099

undefined

Latest

Lead Photo 17HMR V 17 Hornet
Lead Photo 17HMR V 17 Hornet

Head to Head: .17 HMR vs. .17 Hornet

Is the centerfire worthwhile? Or does rimfire take the gold? Find out in this installment of Head to Head.

Are You Ready for Dove Season?

Dove season is upon us. Are you going to be the butt of the jokes on the dove field or the one ribbing your buddies?

Range Review: The Next Generation 2-Tone Taurus Judge Revolver

The latest version of the Taurus Judge incorporates features from the Raging Hunter series with a few unique touches of its own.

Mossberg 590S Shockwave X Federal Shorty Shells: A Backpacking Combo?

This Mossberg and Federal gun and ammunition combination is about as compact as you can get but can it do the job in the great outdoors?

First Look: Excalibur Crossbow Suppressor CRT

Excalibur Crossbow has expanded its Micro Series with the Suppressor CRT. A hunt-ready recurve crossbow, the Suppressor CRT promises ultra-quiet technology, compact maneuverability for utility in treestands and blinds, and durable simplicity without compromising performance.

Field Tested: BOSS Copper Shotshells

With bismuth and tungsten now being in short supply and extra-expensive, BOSS Shotshells switched to copper pellets for its waterfowl loads. What can you expect performance-wise from this new shot type? Read on.

Interests



Get the best of American Hunter delivered to your inbox.