Which Came First? The Side-by-Side or Over/Under Shotgun?

by
posted on August 5, 2013
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
bs_2015_fs.jpg (11)

Recently I overheard a co-worker giving his “brief history of firearms” to the new girl. He told her that side-by-side shotguns are historically older than over/under shotguns. This claim might seem irrelevant, but nonetheless it started an inter-NRA office debate. I believe many Americans view side-by-sides as “granddaddy’s guns,” or the coach guns seen in western films and therefore think of them as old and nostalgic. Conversely, we tend to imagine over/unders as the shiny new Berettas and Brownings at the skeet range, and therefore think of them as modern. But shotgun design did not begin in America, and, in fact, I’ve seen some dinosaur-aged over/unders at the National Firearms Museum. So I investigated.

The Myth
The side-by-side shotgun design is older than the over/under design.

The Expert Opinion
I asked American Hunter contributor, renowned firearm historian and prolific author Terry Wieland—he's written dozens of books on firearms including Vintage British Shotguns—for his opinion. (Opinion is relevant here, because gunsmiths back in the day were better at turning barrels than documenting them, so we have to rely on the accumulated knowledge from experts who rely on the history that is documented.)

“It depends how you define shotgun,” Wieland said. “If you mean a shotgun in the modern sense (from the pin-fire forward) then it's the side-by-side.  If you go back further, to percussion guns and flintlocks, they did not really differentiate between rifles and shotguns the way we do. But the answer is still the side-by-side. I have always read that the first multi-barrel guns were over/unders, going back to ignition systems even before the flintlock. Rifles and shotguns did not part company until the mid-1850s, and once we get to percussion systems of guns in general, the side-by-side was the first because of the difficulty in devising an ignition system for such a barrel configuration. It was only after hammers (tumblers) and strikers moved inside the frame that it became possible to devise a good over/under, and even then there were difficulties for years with hangfires and misfires. You have to go back to the very earliest ignition systems, where powder was ignited by hand, to find over/unders, and once you get back that far, who's to say?”

What the BullShooters Say
This “myth” is not myth: The side-by-side is the granddaddy of double-barrel shotguns.

What You Might Say
If you have evidence that proves otherwise, bring it on!

Latest

Hunter Staring Into The Mist
Hunter Staring Into The Mist

New Zealand Adventure: A Mountain of Dreams

How long can an outdoor writer go without mentioning Tolkien, when penning a story about New Zealand? Read on to find out.

Smith & Wesson Model 1854 .30-30 Win, Available in Walnut

Smith & Wesson has announced the release of the Model 1854 Traditional Walnut, chambered in .30-30 Winchester.

An Ode to the .270 Winchester

What is it about the .270 Winchester that remains so appealing to hunters? Sometimes the designers get things right the first time, and if you wanted to develop a cartridge to rival the venerated .30-06, the .270 comes about as close as is practically possible.

First Look: XS Sights 28 M-Lok Slot Handguard for S&W Model 1854

The new XS Sights handguard for Smith & Wesson’s Model 1854 lever-action rifle offers an added level of customization to the platform.

Remington Rimfire Ammo Roundup

Big Green feeds the .22s oh so well.

New for 2025: Kings Camo XKG Shift Collection

Kings Camo has introduced the XKG Shift Collection, a line of quiet, windproof and ultra-versatile apparel designed with whitetail hunters in mind.

Interests



Get the best of American Hunter delivered to your inbox.