Trigger Pull Weight

by
posted on March 21, 2014
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
qa_ah2015_fs.jpg (13)

Q: A guy from the range, who usually gives pretty good advice, told me he prefers to have a "hair trigger" on his hunting rifles. Is this a good idea?

A: Generally, a very light trigger pull weight (anything less than 3 pounds) is not a good idea on a hunting firearm. Benchrest-type accuracy made possible by a very light trigger isn’t necessary in the field. If it’s cold outside or the shooter is excited (or a combination of both)--conditions encountered frequently while hunting--a light trigger pull can be dangerous when the hunter prematurely and/or unexpectedly pulls the trigger. At the least, a trigger with a pull weight that's too light can result in a poorer shot on game (or a miss) than one having a normal pull if it causes the shooter to fire the gun before the sights are settled. In most cases, a 3- to 5-pound pull weight is all anyone needs in a hunting rifle.

Latest

Jay With Elk
Jay With Elk

Hunting Elk with the 6.5 Creedmoor +Peak

Jay Grazio takes Federal’s new 6.5 Creedmoor +Peak round into the woods … for elk.

When to Sit All Day for Bucks

There are two precise times in the whitetail rut when the all-day sit is worth the time....

Why You Should Have A Bear Tag In Your Pocket

If you’re hunting deer or elk in the West this fall, consider getting a bear tag. Many states offer over-the-counter bear tags, some you can even purchase after the season has begun.

Hardware Review: Dead Air Nomad Ti OTB

Check out Frank Melloni's in-depth review on the Dead Air Nomad Ti OTB.

Shane Mahoney Receives AFWA Lifetime Achievement Award for Conservation Leadership

Shane Mahoney, president and CEO of Conservation Visions Inc., received the Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies’ (AFWA) 2026 Lifetime Achievement Award at a September ceremony in Lancaster, Pa.

Colorado Voters Reject Right to Hunt and Fish Measure

On November 3, Colorado voters rejected Amendment 83, a proposed constitutional amendment that would have designated hunting and fishing as the preferred means of managing the state’s fish and wildlife populations. To pass, the amendment needed 55 percent of the vote or more. It fell about 10 percentage points short of that minimum.

Interests



Get the best of American Hunter delivered to your inbox.