NRA Files Amicus Brief Supporting Firearm Manufacturers

by
posted on January 16, 2025
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
NRA ILA Logo

NRA filed an amicus brief supporting firearm manufacturers in a case where the plaintiffs allege that the manufacturers’ pro-Second Amendment social media posts caused a third party to commit a horrific public shooting.

The firearm manufacturers regularly post pro-Second Amendment content on social media. These posts often contain imagery of firearms, individuals in military gear, and tactical equipment, and express support for the right to keep and bear arms.

After an individual used various firearms—some of which were manufactured by the defendants in this case—in a crime, the plaintiffs filed a lawsuit claiming that the manufacturers’ social media posts influenced the shooter to act.

NRA’s brief focuses on certain First Amendment aspects of the case. The plaintiffs claim, in essence, that the manufacturers’ social media posts are not protected by the First Amendment because they are either (1) commercial speech or (2) incitement to violence. NRA’s brief explains that the social media posts are not commercial speech because their primary purpose is to advocate for the Second Amendment, not to facilitate a commercial transaction. And either way, the plaintiffs’ attempt to censor the posts is viewpoint discrimination based on the pro-Second Amendment views expressed in their posts, which presumptively violates the First Amendment.

Moreover, the manufacturers’ posts did not incite the shooter to commit violence. There is nothing sinister about the militaristic imagery in the posts. Rather, there has always been a synergistic connection between military, law enforcement, and the right to keep and bear arms.

At its core, this is a case where the plaintiffs are trying to censor the manufacturers because they disagree with their message. But the manufacturers have a right to speak (or post) in support of the Second Amendment, and the plaintiffs cannot violate the First Amendment to stop them from doing so.

The case, Lowy v. Daniel Defense, is currently before the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. Stay tuned to nraila.org for future updates.

Latest

Fenson Venison Italian Wedding Soup (4)
Fenson Venison Italian Wedding Soup (4)

Recipe: Venison Italian Wedding Soup

Looking for a hot bowl of soup to finish out a hunt? Look no further than this wild game take on Italian Wedding Soup by Brad Fenson.

Winchester Xpert Waterfowl Swapping Paint this Weekend

If you’re not in a duck blind this weekend, Winchester Ammunition is giving you a hunting-themed alternative.

Arkansas Sets New Alligator Harvest Record

By the time Arkansas’ two-weekend alligator season wrapped up in the predawn light on Sept. 29 hunters had tallied 205 alligators.

Thompson/Center Arms Announces the Return of the All-New Triumph

Thompson/Center Arms, has announced the return of the all-new Triumph, a modern evolution of one of the most trusted muzzleloaders ever built

100th Iowa Pheasant Season Opens Saturday—Big Numbers Expected

Phone calls poured in after the Iowa Department of Natural Resources (DNR) posted its annual pheasant survey on the Internet. Hunters from across the Midwest wanted to know the best place to hunt.

Beretta USA Manurhin MR73 Revolvers Back on the Market

After a long stretch of backorders driven by global demand, Beretta USA has announced the return to availability of the Manurhin .357 Magnum revolvers.

Interests



Get the best of American Hunter delivered to your inbox.