NRA Files Amicus Brief Supporting Firearm Manufacturers

by
posted on January 16, 2025
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
NRA ILA Logo

NRA filed an amicus brief supporting firearm manufacturers in a case where the plaintiffs allege that the manufacturers’ pro-Second Amendment social media posts caused a third party to commit a horrific public shooting.

The firearm manufacturers regularly post pro-Second Amendment content on social media. These posts often contain imagery of firearms, individuals in military gear, and tactical equipment, and express support for the right to keep and bear arms.

After an individual used various firearms—some of which were manufactured by the defendants in this case—in a crime, the plaintiffs filed a lawsuit claiming that the manufacturers’ social media posts influenced the shooter to act.

NRA’s brief focuses on certain First Amendment aspects of the case. The plaintiffs claim, in essence, that the manufacturers’ social media posts are not protected by the First Amendment because they are either (1) commercial speech or (2) incitement to violence. NRA’s brief explains that the social media posts are not commercial speech because their primary purpose is to advocate for the Second Amendment, not to facilitate a commercial transaction. And either way, the plaintiffs’ attempt to censor the posts is viewpoint discrimination based on the pro-Second Amendment views expressed in their posts, which presumptively violates the First Amendment.

Moreover, the manufacturers’ posts did not incite the shooter to commit violence. There is nothing sinister about the militaristic imagery in the posts. Rather, there has always been a synergistic connection between military, law enforcement, and the right to keep and bear arms.

At its core, this is a case where the plaintiffs are trying to censor the manufacturers because they disagree with their message. But the manufacturers have a right to speak (or post) in support of the Second Amendment, and the plaintiffs cannot violate the First Amendment to stop them from doing so.

The case, Lowy v. Daniel Defense, is currently before the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. Stay tuned to nraila.org for future updates.

Latest

Herman Shooting Xpert
Herman Shooting Xpert

#SundayGunday: Winchester Repeating Arms Xpert Suppressor Ready

Looking for a smooth shooting little rimfire to take on squirrel and other varmint? Want it chambered in a highly-accurate rimfire round, updated for the 21st Century? Welcome to this week’s #SundayGunday, where we’re checking out the Xpert, from Winchester Repeating Arms, chambered in .21 Sharp.

Gamo Adds .25 Caliber to Swarm Breakbarrels

Gamo USA’s line of Swarm multi-shot break-barrel rifles just got a new big brother. After years of customer requests, a .25 caliber Swarm Magnum Pro is available to the public.

The NRA Foundation Opened 2026 Grant Applications August 4

More than $509 million awarded since 1990 to support firearm education, safety, and training

First Look: RCBS 6.5 Creedmoor X-Die

RCBS has announced the expansion of its patented, popular X-Die Series of dies with the addition of a 6.5 Creedmoor full-length sizer die.

New for 2025: Escort Shotguns Introduces the Slugger and Slugger Tact

Designed with simplicity, durability, and affordability in mind, the purpose-driven Slugger and Slugger Tact from Escort are tailored to meet the demands of shooters looking for dependable performance in home defense or sporting applications. 

Poaching Ring Members Fined More than $100,000

A southern Illinois Federal Court sentenced five Mississippi men in July after they admitted to using spotlights to poach whitetail deer in Massac, Jefferson, Union, Pope and Clark counties in Illinois.

Interests



Get the best of American Hunter delivered to your inbox.