NRA Files Amicus Brief Supporting Firearm Manufacturers

by
posted on January 16, 2025
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
NRA ILA Logo

NRA filed an amicus brief supporting firearm manufacturers in a case where the plaintiffs allege that the manufacturers’ pro-Second Amendment social media posts caused a third party to commit a horrific public shooting.

The firearm manufacturers regularly post pro-Second Amendment content on social media. These posts often contain imagery of firearms, individuals in military gear, and tactical equipment, and express support for the right to keep and bear arms.

After an individual used various firearms—some of which were manufactured by the defendants in this case—in a crime, the plaintiffs filed a lawsuit claiming that the manufacturers’ social media posts influenced the shooter to act.

NRA’s brief focuses on certain First Amendment aspects of the case. The plaintiffs claim, in essence, that the manufacturers’ social media posts are not protected by the First Amendment because they are either (1) commercial speech or (2) incitement to violence. NRA’s brief explains that the social media posts are not commercial speech because their primary purpose is to advocate for the Second Amendment, not to facilitate a commercial transaction. And either way, the plaintiffs’ attempt to censor the posts is viewpoint discrimination based on the pro-Second Amendment views expressed in their posts, which presumptively violates the First Amendment.

Moreover, the manufacturers’ posts did not incite the shooter to commit violence. There is nothing sinister about the militaristic imagery in the posts. Rather, there has always been a synergistic connection between military, law enforcement, and the right to keep and bear arms.

At its core, this is a case where the plaintiffs are trying to censor the manufacturers because they disagree with their message. But the manufacturers have a right to speak (or post) in support of the Second Amendment, and the plaintiffs cannot violate the First Amendment to stop them from doing so.

The case, Lowy v. Daniel Defense, is currently before the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. Stay tuned to nraila.org for future updates.

Latest

W H2026 10 Elk Hunt Win AK1A6710
W H2026 10 Elk Hunt Win AK1A6710

Elk Hunt Redemption: A Tale of Two Elkies

Struggle makes success sweeter, but it’s also a royal pain in the hindquarters.

Free, First Annual Mentored Pheasant Hunt on Long Island

The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) is hosting a free mentored pheasant hunt in Suffolk County. It provides a hunting opportunity for individuals interested in pheasant hunting for the first time—or those returning to the pursuit—in December.

#SundayGunday: MDT HNT26

On this week's #SundayGunday, we’re taking a look at a unique chassis system from MDT, the HNT26. Designed for hunters looking for the ultimate lightweight setup, the HNT26 is just as perfect for packing on the miles as it is for making a precision shot at last light.

Hunting Elk with the 6.5 Creedmoor +Peak

Jay Grazio takes Federal’s new 6.5 Creedmoor +Peak round into the woods … for elk.

When to Sit All Day for Bucks

There are two precise times in the whitetail rut when the all-day sit is worth the time....

Why You Should Have A Bear Tag In Your Pocket

If you’re hunting deer or elk in the West this fall, consider getting a bear tag. Many states offer over-the-counter bear tags, some you can even purchase after the season has begun.

Interests



Get the best of American Hunter delivered to your inbox.