NRA Files Amicus Brief Supporting Firearm Manufacturers

by
posted on January 16, 2025
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
NRA ILA Logo

NRA filed an amicus brief supporting firearm manufacturers in a case where the plaintiffs allege that the manufacturers’ pro-Second Amendment social media posts caused a third party to commit a horrific public shooting.

The firearm manufacturers regularly post pro-Second Amendment content on social media. These posts often contain imagery of firearms, individuals in military gear, and tactical equipment, and express support for the right to keep and bear arms.

After an individual used various firearms—some of which were manufactured by the defendants in this case—in a crime, the plaintiffs filed a lawsuit claiming that the manufacturers’ social media posts influenced the shooter to act.

NRA’s brief focuses on certain First Amendment aspects of the case. The plaintiffs claim, in essence, that the manufacturers’ social media posts are not protected by the First Amendment because they are either (1) commercial speech or (2) incitement to violence. NRA’s brief explains that the social media posts are not commercial speech because their primary purpose is to advocate for the Second Amendment, not to facilitate a commercial transaction. And either way, the plaintiffs’ attempt to censor the posts is viewpoint discrimination based on the pro-Second Amendment views expressed in their posts, which presumptively violates the First Amendment.

Moreover, the manufacturers’ posts did not incite the shooter to commit violence. There is nothing sinister about the militaristic imagery in the posts. Rather, there has always been a synergistic connection between military, law enforcement, and the right to keep and bear arms.

At its core, this is a case where the plaintiffs are trying to censor the manufacturers because they disagree with their message. But the manufacturers have a right to speak (or post) in support of the Second Amendment, and the plaintiffs cannot violate the First Amendment to stop them from doing so.

The case, Lowy v. Daniel Defense, is currently before the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. Stay tuned to nraila.org for future updates.

Latest

Ledegrants To Help Address
Ledegrants To Help Address

Grants to Help Address Mallard Production in Great Lakes Regions

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Migratory Bird Conservation Commission recently granted Ducks Unlimited (DU) and numerous partners $9 million in North American Wetlands Conservation Act (NAWCA) funds.

Head to Head: 6.5 Weatherby RPM vs. 6.5-300 Weatherby Magnum

Which 6.5 will come out on top? The 6.5 Weatherby RPM, or the 6.5-300 Weatherby Magnum? Find out in this week's installment of Head to Head.

New for 2026: Warne Maxima Horizontal QD Rings

Warne has introduced Maxima Horizontal Quick Detach Rings, expanding the Maxima product family with a fast and reliable quick-detach mounting solution.

First Look: Federal Suppressor Case

Federal Ammunition is now shipping its Suppressor Case, designed to keep suppressors safe and secure when not in use.

MTM Introduces Limited-Edition America250 Ammo Crates

MTM Molded Products Company has released its limited-edition America250 Ammo Crate Series, a patriotic tribute to 250 years of American freedom, independence and self-reliance. 

How an Armed American Saved President Trump’s Life

Sgt. Aaron Zaliponi of Adams Township (Pa.) Police Department is the NRA’s Officer of the Year. 

Interests



Get the best of American Hunter delivered to your inbox.