NRA Files Amicus Brief Supporting Firearm Manufacturers

by
posted on January 16, 2025
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
NRA ILA Logo

NRA filed an amicus brief supporting firearm manufacturers in a case where the plaintiffs allege that the manufacturers’ pro-Second Amendment social media posts caused a third party to commit a horrific public shooting.

The firearm manufacturers regularly post pro-Second Amendment content on social media. These posts often contain imagery of firearms, individuals in military gear, and tactical equipment, and express support for the right to keep and bear arms.

After an individual used various firearms—some of which were manufactured by the defendants in this case—in a crime, the plaintiffs filed a lawsuit claiming that the manufacturers’ social media posts influenced the shooter to act.

NRA’s brief focuses on certain First Amendment aspects of the case. The plaintiffs claim, in essence, that the manufacturers’ social media posts are not protected by the First Amendment because they are either (1) commercial speech or (2) incitement to violence. NRA’s brief explains that the social media posts are not commercial speech because their primary purpose is to advocate for the Second Amendment, not to facilitate a commercial transaction. And either way, the plaintiffs’ attempt to censor the posts is viewpoint discrimination based on the pro-Second Amendment views expressed in their posts, which presumptively violates the First Amendment.

Moreover, the manufacturers’ posts did not incite the shooter to commit violence. There is nothing sinister about the militaristic imagery in the posts. Rather, there has always been a synergistic connection between military, law enforcement, and the right to keep and bear arms.

At its core, this is a case where the plaintiffs are trying to censor the manufacturers because they disagree with their message. But the manufacturers have a right to speak (or post) in support of the Second Amendment, and the plaintiffs cannot violate the First Amendment to stop them from doing so.

The case, Lowy v. Daniel Defense, is currently before the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. Stay tuned to nraila.org for future updates.

Latest

Lead Photo 22 Loing
Lead Photo 22 Loing

Behind the Bullet: The .22 Long

If we could rewind the clock to 1871, before the .45-70 Government and .45 Colt existed, and when cartridges themselves were just establishing a foothold in the shooting world, you’d find a pair of .22-caliber rimfire designs: the .22 Short and the .22 Long. Aptly named, these cartridges would survive well into the 20th century, ultimately being conquered by the .22 Long Rifle cartridge. But in certain situations, the .22 Long cartridge still makes good sense, and actually has a few specialized applications.

Reviewed: Sitka’s Blizzard Pro Parka

Sitka seems to keep “one upping” themselves with gear that not only keeps hunters in the field at a good comfort level, but also with gear that is well made and fits extremely well. Need a parka for the extreme cold, wet or wind? This Sitka product that could be the last parka you will need!

Suffix to Say: The Savage 99 by the Letter(s)

A savage primer to the letters that make up the models of the 99.

New Black-Bellied Whistling Duck Season in Louisiana

A special nine-day Louisiana black-bellied whistling duck season began Oct. 3 and runs through Oct. 11.

Choosing the Proper Goose Load

When gunning for geese, use these tips to select the optimal load.

First Look: Derya Arms EX1300 O/U Shotgun

Derya Arms has introduced the EX1300, a break-action over/under shotgun offered in 12-gauge, 20-gauge and .410 bore.

Interests



Get the best of American Hunter delivered to your inbox.