NRA Files Amicus Brief Supporting Firearm Manufacturers

by
posted on January 16, 2025
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
NRA ILA Logo

NRA filed an amicus brief supporting firearm manufacturers in a case where the plaintiffs allege that the manufacturers’ pro-Second Amendment social media posts caused a third party to commit a horrific public shooting.

The firearm manufacturers regularly post pro-Second Amendment content on social media. These posts often contain imagery of firearms, individuals in military gear, and tactical equipment, and express support for the right to keep and bear arms.

After an individual used various firearms—some of which were manufactured by the defendants in this case—in a crime, the plaintiffs filed a lawsuit claiming that the manufacturers’ social media posts influenced the shooter to act.

NRA’s brief focuses on certain First Amendment aspects of the case. The plaintiffs claim, in essence, that the manufacturers’ social media posts are not protected by the First Amendment because they are either (1) commercial speech or (2) incitement to violence. NRA’s brief explains that the social media posts are not commercial speech because their primary purpose is to advocate for the Second Amendment, not to facilitate a commercial transaction. And either way, the plaintiffs’ attempt to censor the posts is viewpoint discrimination based on the pro-Second Amendment views expressed in their posts, which presumptively violates the First Amendment.

Moreover, the manufacturers’ posts did not incite the shooter to commit violence. There is nothing sinister about the militaristic imagery in the posts. Rather, there has always been a synergistic connection between military, law enforcement, and the right to keep and bear arms.

At its core, this is a case where the plaintiffs are trying to censor the manufacturers because they disagree with their message. But the manufacturers have a right to speak (or post) in support of the Second Amendment, and the plaintiffs cannot violate the First Amendment to stop them from doing so.

The case, Lowy v. Daniel Defense, is currently before the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. Stay tuned to nraila.org for future updates.

Latest

Decoy Spread
Decoy Spread

7 Sure-Fire Ways to Fail When Hunting

Looking to come home from the field empty-handed? Simply follow one or more of these avenues to failure.

First Look: Radians Outdoor's Heated Mossy Oak Bottomland Apparel

Radians Outdoors is cranking up the warmth this season with new heated gear in Mossy Oak Bottomland, the legendary camouflage pattern trusted by hunters for more than 35 years.

5 Black Friday Sales for Hunters

Looking for some hunter- and outdoorsman-focused sales as we swing into the holiday season? Look no further than the great sales and deals going on at the retailers below.

Hardware Review: Riton 5 Primal 3-18x50mm

Check out Frank Melloni's Hardware Review on the Riton 5 Primal 3-18x50mm.

Duck Hunting Haven: Conservation in Colonsay

Delta Waterfowl’s mission is on full display during a hunt for ducks, geese and cranes in Colonsay, Saskatchewan.

Hunter Missing 20 Days Found Alive

Sixty-five-year-old Ron Dailey, of Selma, Calif., was found alive on Nov. 1 after spending 20 days and nights stranded alone and cold in the Sierra National Forest. What began as a one-day deer hunting trip that began on Oct. 13 turned into a life-and-death situation after a series of mishaps while driving to his destination.

Interests



Get the best of American Hunter delivered to your inbox.