NRA Files Amicus Brief Supporting Firearm Manufacturers

by
posted on January 16, 2025
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
NRA ILA Logo

NRA filed an amicus brief supporting firearm manufacturers in a case where the plaintiffs allege that the manufacturers’ pro-Second Amendment social media posts caused a third party to commit a horrific public shooting.

The firearm manufacturers regularly post pro-Second Amendment content on social media. These posts often contain imagery of firearms, individuals in military gear, and tactical equipment, and express support for the right to keep and bear arms.

After an individual used various firearms—some of which were manufactured by the defendants in this case—in a crime, the plaintiffs filed a lawsuit claiming that the manufacturers’ social media posts influenced the shooter to act.

NRA’s brief focuses on certain First Amendment aspects of the case. The plaintiffs claim, in essence, that the manufacturers’ social media posts are not protected by the First Amendment because they are either (1) commercial speech or (2) incitement to violence. NRA’s brief explains that the social media posts are not commercial speech because their primary purpose is to advocate for the Second Amendment, not to facilitate a commercial transaction. And either way, the plaintiffs’ attempt to censor the posts is viewpoint discrimination based on the pro-Second Amendment views expressed in their posts, which presumptively violates the First Amendment.

Moreover, the manufacturers’ posts did not incite the shooter to commit violence. There is nothing sinister about the militaristic imagery in the posts. Rather, there has always been a synergistic connection between military, law enforcement, and the right to keep and bear arms.

At its core, this is a case where the plaintiffs are trying to censor the manufacturers because they disagree with their message. But the manufacturers have a right to speak (or post) in support of the Second Amendment, and the plaintiffs cannot violate the First Amendment to stop them from doing so.

The case, Lowy v. Daniel Defense, is currently before the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. Stay tuned to nraila.org for future updates.

Latest

013 TRH350 B5 Gunammo 01
013 TRH350 B5 Gunammo 01

Range Review: Taurus 350 Legend Raging Hunter

The Taurus .350 Legend Raging Hunter is a gentle giant, managing to packs a serious punch without breaking your wrist. Read on for a full review on this weighty wheelgun.

New for 2026: ATN ThOR 6 Elite

ATN Corp has launched the ATN ThOR 6 Elite. Powered by an all-new 6th Generation thermal engine and ATN's proprietary SharpIR AI image enhancement technology, the ThOR 6 Elite was designed from the ground up for hunters of all stripes.

First Look: Hornady American Whitetail 400 Legend

Hornady has released 400 Legend 210 grain InterLock ammunition in the American Whitetail line.

The .44 (4) You—An Exploration of .44 Magnum Platforms

Andi Bogard takes a tour through .44 land—from handhelds to levers and beyond—to find the flavor that fits your focus.

First Look: Remington's 2026 Limited Edition Bullet Knife

Remington is proud to announce the availability of its 2026 Limited Edition Bullet Knife: King of the Mountain. This collector-focused release continues Remington's long-running Bullet Knife tradition and is now shipping to dealers nationwide.

New for 2026: Woox High Grade American Walnut Stocks

Woox, manufacturers of Italian-American made gunstocks, axes and knives, has introduced a new "High Grade" line of stocks.

Interests



Get the best of American Hunter delivered to your inbox.