Maine's High Court Sides with Bear Hunters, Rejects HSUS Lawsuit

by
posted on April 15, 2016
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
maine_black_bears_f.jpg

Photo Courtesy of USFWS

The Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) is no stranger to inserting itself into state-level proceedings to advance its own anti-hunter agenda. Such was the case in 2014 when the organization—through the front group "Mainers for Fair Bear Hunting"—filed a lawsuit against the state of Maine. As the U.S. Sportsmen’s Alliance (USSA) reported on Thursday, Apr. 14, the case was dismissed in 2015 by a Superior Court justice and finally laid to rest this week by the Maine Supreme Court.

The case originated in 2014 following the defeat of Maine’s Question 1 in a citizen’s vote. Question 1 was a hunting ban initiative originally launched by the aforementioned Mainers for Fair Bear Hunting. The HSUS-sponsored legislation would have banned the use of bait, dogs and traps when bear hunting. It was opposed by state sportsmen as well as many professional wildlife managers. Following Question 1’s defeat in an open vote, Mainers for Fair Bear Hunting sued the state of Maine, alleging that the Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife had an inappropriate level of engagement in the campaign.

According to the USSA news release, the original lawsuit sought to remove television advertisements of the Maine Wildlife Conservation Council—which was fighting to preserve the state’s nationally recognized black-bear management program—from the air. The lawsuit alleged the ads featured state personnel talking about the dangers of Question 1.

In short, HSUS was upset that the state’s coalition of sporting and conservation organizations came out against Question 1, and was offering honest science in the face of HSUS’ attempt to have the future of bear hunting in Maine dictated by an anti-hunting-fueled vote. The case eventually reached the state’s Superior Court in 2015, where it was dismissed on grounds that it was moot.

While the Supreme Court ruling effectively ends the issue, hunters must remain vigilant as HSUS proves time and again that it will defy the scientific community in its quest to stop all hunting. In this case, at least, the good guys won the day.

Latest

NRA Foundation Logo LEDE
NRA Foundation Logo LEDE

NRA Foundation Donates $30,000 to Help Feed Missouri Families

The NRA Foundation has once again stepped up to fight hunger in Missouri, donating $30,000 to help feed children and families across the state through a partnership with the Conservation Federation of Missouri (CFM), Feeding Missouri, and the Share the Harvest Program.

New Video Demonstrates Benefits of School Programs on Conservation

The latest Partner With a Payer video released by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service highlights the impact of youth shooting sport programs and the role they play in long-term conservation funding.

Hardware Review: Barnes Harvest Collection

Check out Bryce Towsley's review of this fall whitetail slayer from Barnes.

New for 2025: Alps OutdoorZ DU Legacy Line

For those seeking a fusion of classic looks and continued performance from their waterfowl hunting accessories, the Alps OutdoorZ’s DU Legacy Line Accessories are worth a look.

Hunting with a Twist: Rethinking the .30-06

In a world where the wheel seems to be continually reinvented, ballistically speaking, what about working with an existing platform to achieve new performance goals? Come with me as we take an academic tour of an American icon and its versatility as a worldwide critter getter. Let me re-introduce you to the .30-06 Springfield.

First Look: AirForce Airguns Condor-SL and CondorSS-SL

AirForce Airguns, the American manufacturer of high-power, modular Pre-Charged Pneumatic rifles, has announced the release of the Condor-SL and CondorSS-SL.

Interests



Get the best of American Hunter delivered to your inbox.