Maine's High Court Sides with Bear Hunters, Rejects HSUS Lawsuit

by
posted on April 15, 2016
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
maine_black_bears_f.jpg

Photo Courtesy of USFWS

The Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) is no stranger to inserting itself into state-level proceedings to advance its own anti-hunter agenda. Such was the case in 2014 when the organization—through the front group "Mainers for Fair Bear Hunting"—filed a lawsuit against the state of Maine. As the U.S. Sportsmen’s Alliance (USSA) reported on Thursday, Apr. 14, the case was dismissed in 2015 by a Superior Court justice and finally laid to rest this week by the Maine Supreme Court.

The case originated in 2014 following the defeat of Maine’s Question 1 in a citizen’s vote. Question 1 was a hunting ban initiative originally launched by the aforementioned Mainers for Fair Bear Hunting. The HSUS-sponsored legislation would have banned the use of bait, dogs and traps when bear hunting. It was opposed by state sportsmen as well as many professional wildlife managers. Following Question 1’s defeat in an open vote, Mainers for Fair Bear Hunting sued the state of Maine, alleging that the Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife had an inappropriate level of engagement in the campaign.

According to the USSA news release, the original lawsuit sought to remove television advertisements of the Maine Wildlife Conservation Council—which was fighting to preserve the state’s nationally recognized black-bear management program—from the air. The lawsuit alleged the ads featured state personnel talking about the dangers of Question 1.

In short, HSUS was upset that the state’s coalition of sporting and conservation organizations came out against Question 1, and was offering honest science in the face of HSUS’ attempt to have the future of bear hunting in Maine dictated by an anti-hunting-fueled vote. The case eventually reached the state’s Superior Court in 2015, where it was dismissed on grounds that it was moot.

While the Supreme Court ruling effectively ends the issue, hunters must remain vigilant as HSUS proves time and again that it will defy the scientific community in its quest to stop all hunting. In this case, at least, the good guys won the day.

Latest

SHADOWS REMOVED005 HBL28 R Gun 01
SHADOWS REMOVED005 HBL28 R Gun 01

Range Review: Heritage Badlander Field .410 Bore

This flexible side-by-side from Heritage Manufacturing is ready for a variety of shooting roles including turkey hunting! Check out the full review of the Badlander here.

Win Leica Optics in Sitka’s Diverge 14 Photo Contest

No purchase is necessary to enter the Sitka’s Diverge 14 Photo Contest, and the grand prize winner will net gear worth more than $17,500 from Leica, Sitka, Pelican and Adobe.

Hardware Review: Pulsar Thermion 2 LRF XL60

Simply put, thermal weapon sights represent the greatest technological advantage a hunter or home protector can have since the advent of the firearm itself. The Pulsar Thermion 2 LRF is a great example. Check out Jeff Johnston's Hardware Review of it here.

American Made: What’s New at Griffin & Howe?

The classic brand is once again thriving in New Jersey, offering a hosts of products, services and even courses.

#SundayGunday: Heritage Manufacturing Model 92

On this week's #SundayGunday, we’re diving into a rifle that blends classic American design with modern manufacturing: the Heritage Model 92 lever-action. This gun pays homage to one of the most iconic lever-actions ever created, John Browning’s legendary Model 92. Learn more about it in this exclusive video.

Premium Upland Loads: Worth the Price?

Not all shotshells are created equal. “Premium” loads offer elevated performance at a cost, but are they necessary? To find out, continue reading.

Interests



Get the best of American Hunter delivered to your inbox.