It appeared as of last week that this might be the year Virginia finally did away with its draconian ban on Sunday hunting: A bipartisan Sunday hunting bill was introduced to the senate by a northern Virginia Democrat; a pro-hunting governor was in office; and a new study found that allowing hunting on Sundays would bring $296 million and 3,927 jobs to the state. Unfortunately the bill died in committee and Virginia will remain one of only six states that ban Sunday hunting. I can swallow that (though I don't have to like it), but here's the part of the story that's infuriating: The Virginia Hunting Dog Alliance (VHDA) turned out for the senate committee hearing and testified against Sunday hunting! In doing so the VHDA made hunters appear divided on the issue (which the media quickly jumped on) and their argument--namely that Sunday hunting would raise anti-hunting sentiment--is practically an apology for hunting, a suggestion our sport is inherently offensive and therefore we should limit the public's exposure to it. Not only is that highly insulting, but states that have recently overturned Sunday-hunting bans such as New York, Michigan and Ohio prove it simply isn't true. It's important to note that the VHDA consists mainly of hunters who pursue deer and bears with dogs. Of all sportsmen, they ought to understand the danger of divisiveness. Anti-hunting groups have made banning the use of dogs for hunting big game a top priority, attacking it in Maine, Vermont and elsewhere. Those who hunt big game with dogs need the support of fellow sportsmen if their sport is to survive, but throwing us under the bus in regards to Sunday hunting is no way to earn it.
|
|
|
|










Comments
ADD YOUR COMMENT
Enter your comments below, they will appear within 24 hours
25 Responses to Virginia Hunting Dog Alliance Betrays Hunters