Anti-Hunters Cry Foul, but Rhino Auction Benefits Species

Anti-hunters may not like the idea, but one animal dying to save the species is a small price to pay for conservation.

A couple of months ago, the Internet buzzed with complaints about the Dallas Safari Club’s plans to auction an opportunity for someone to hunt and kill a black rhino in Namibia. Anti-hunters tried to block the auction. They didn’t succeed.

Instead, an unknown winner will pay $350,000 for the privilege of hunting and killing one of the mighty beasts. Representatives from Dallas Safari Club say the winning bid might have been higher were it not for the negative publicity. That’s a shame, because all the money—every last cent of it—will go toward rhino conservation.

The rhinoceros, whether we’re talking white or black, is endangered. Incidentally, no rhino is white or black. The white rhino and black rhino look similar to each other; they’re both huge animals in the ungulate family Rhinocerotidae. The main difference between them is the shape of their mouths. White rhinos have broad, flat lips for eating stuff off the ground, mostly—they’re grazers. Black rhinos have long, pointed lips for eating foliage—they’re browsers. But the black rhino is a member of Africa’s Big Five, which also includes Cape buffalo, elephant, lion and leopard. As such it’s highly prized by big-game hunters who travel the world.

Both critters are highly prized because rhino horn is revered in some cultures for its ornamental or perceived medicinal purposes. The horn consists of keratin, the same protein in our fingernails and hair, so it’s actually worthless to humans. Yet rhino horn is worth as much on the black market as gold. Poachers killed more than a thousand rhinos last year in South Africa alone to feed such ridiculous appetites. Officials worry Namibia could be the next killing ground for poachers. To prevent that, considerable conservation efforts are ongoing.

Rhino conservation and anti-poaching efforts are expensive. To immobilize such an animal and fit it with security devices, to adequately survey its numbers in the wild and to patrol its domain (in the air and on the ground) takes tens of thousands of dollars a year. Poor African nations simply don’t have the resources to sustain such costs.

Enter the winning bidder. He or she now will apply to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for an import permit that will allow the trophy to be brought to these shores (the Service has agreed to authorize the permit). The $350,000 will be wired to Namibia as soon as that permit is secured.

As word of the winning bid spread, folks online complained it was a crime to pay to hunt an endangered species. I’ll agree it’s ironic, but not criminal. Some hunters suggested the winning bidder dart the rhino, take a trophy picture and let it live, as is frequently done with white rhinos (since they cannot be hunted and killed). Either way, folks were ignoring the truth: The animal was going to die regardless. You see, older bull rhinos are tough on their own. When they are no longer prime males within a herd, they are cast off, and then become a danger to the rest of their ilk, even killing other members of the herds they once called their own. So they are culled by managers in places like Namibia. Naturally, Namibia thought it was better to raise some money for their larger goals rather than simply tell a game ranger to kill another rhino.

There’s an old adage among conservationists: If it pays, it stays. Conservationists understand the death of one rhino is a small price to pay to save the rest of the species. It’s a pity preservationists don’t acknowledge that.

Share |



Enter your comments below, they will appear within 24 hours

Your Name

Your Email

Your Comment

3 Responses to Anti-Hunters Cry Foul, but Rhino Auction Benefits Species

Petr-Johan wrote:
September 08, 2014

50 years ago I worked for the BSAP (British South African Police) doing game conservation and poacher control-the two must of necessity be combined. Then the work we did to combat poachers was considered, cruel, unkind, inhuman. Now they are advertising for people to work in that same area for considerable sums-as I recall I was paid about five hundred Rand a month and had to provide my own horse and weaponry. What the Dallas group is doing is both correct and a more than balanced approach. Now, for my wishes, and for nothing, I'll go back and shoot poachers and still provide my own horse and weaponry.

Left Coast Chuck wrote:
March 16, 2014

The answer is very easy: All the bambiests have to do is get one of their rich animal lovers like Bob Barker to bid $375,000 for the hunt and then not go or go and just take pictures. That's the problem with the animal rights groups. They spend very little money to actually save animals. Most of their money goes to make lawyers rich. How many bambiests have bought and preserved land for duck habitat or some of the other animals they bleat about?

Tim Ferrall wrote:
March 14, 2014

Old rhino bulls are often impotent and unable to breed. They ARE, however, still strong enough to hold a harem of cows, thus preventing those cows from producing offspring. As unintuitive as it sounds, removing a old bull actually increases the rhino population.